Skip to content
  • Home

  • Productivity

  • App tips

App tips

11 min read

What are agentic workflows?

By Ben Lyso · August 5, 2026
Hero image with an icon representing a process or workflow

The night before a recent week-long vacation, my home air conditioning stopped working. Which is, of course, the perfect time for that to happen. I called my usual handyman in a panic, and he fixed it while I was gone—but he also wiped off the outdoor unit, replaced my filter, and even replaced some light switch panels that I had been meaning to get to for weeks. I'd given him a problem, and he fixed it; alongside a handful of other tasks he knew needed repair.

Historically, most software has never worked that way. It waits for you to spell out every click, and the moment something unexpected turns up, it stops and pings you for help. Agentic workflows can follow a fixed script, but they can also take a goal and figure out how to reach it, making decisions, using tools, and adjusting as they go.

Here, I'll tell you everything you need to know about agentic workflows, how they work, and how Zapier can help you build them securely. 

Table of contents:

  • What is an agentic workflow?

  • Agentic vs. non-agentic workflows

  • Key components of agentic workflows

  • How do agentic workflows work?

  • Single agent vs. multi-agent workflows

  • Top benefits of agentic workflows

  • Popular tools and frameworks for agentic workflows

  • Real-world agentic workflow use cases

  • Build agentic workflows with Zapier

What is an agentic workflow?

An agentic workflow is an AI-driven process where one or more AI agents make decisions, take actions, and coordinate tasks toward a goal with minimal human intervention. It reasons about what should happen next, calls whatever tools it needs, checks the result, and tries something else if the first attempt flops. In other words, agentic AI is like a virtual version of my handyman, completing the tasks you've assigned, but also independently solving problems as they arise.

You can add agentic behavior into a traditional workflow using a tool like AI by Zapier, which lets you drop AI steps right into an automation. Or you can kick off agentic workflows from an AI agent harness, like ChatGPT or Claude, using a tool like Zapier MCP to get it to act across your tech stack.

A screenshot of the Zapier MCP prompt builder.

Agentic vs. non-agentic workflows

A flowchart that shows the difference between a non-agentic workflow and an agentic workflow.
  • Non-agentic workflows (often called deterministic workflows) follow predefined rules: a trigger fires, a fixed sequence of actions runs in order, and the task is completed. They can use filters and conditional logic, but they can't reason through things. That's great for repetitive, predictable work that needs to be executed the same way every time—move this record there, send that notification, tick that box. The catch is, a rule-based workflow can't handle a situation nobody anticipated, so the instant something unplanned or weird happens, it either breaks or dumps the whole mess on a human.

  • Agentic workflows are built for exactly that weirdness. They adapt to real-time data and unexpected conditions, deciding what to do next based on what's really in front of them rather than what someone guessed might happen back when they built it.

One isn't better than the other—you really need both. Zapier, for example, lets you use both in the same workflow. Not only does that give you the benefits of both types of automation (predictable and adaptive), but it also saves you tokens (also known as money). Every AI step costs something, so firing off an AI model to handle work that a simple rule could do is a bit like hiring a handyman to alphabetize your spice rack.

The smarter pattern is to let cheap, deterministic, non-agentic steps do the grunt work and save the agentic AI for the moment that actually needs a brain. 

Picture a lead-intake workflow: a basic automation could filter out submissions from countries you don't sell to (no thinking required), and only the leads that survive get handed to an AI step that researches the company and drafts a first-touch email. You get judgment exactly where it matters, without paying tokens to mull over leads you were never going to call.

Key components of agentic workflows

Most agentic workflows are assembled from the same handful of parts. Once you can name them, the whole category stops feeling like magic and starts looking like something you could build on a Tuesday afternoon.

  • Large language models (LLMs). LLMs are the reasoning engine. The LLM interprets instructions, weighs context, and decides what to do, which is why it sits at the center of nearly every agentic system.

  • AI agents. Agents are built on an LLM and given instructions, tools, and a goal. The agent is the "worker" that actually carries out a task or role rather than just generating text.

  • Tool use. This is the ability to reach outside the model and get information from external software—checking a CRM, pulling a spreadsheet row, sending a message—so the agent can act on the real world instead of only describing it.

  • Adaptability and feedback. This is the loop that lets an agent evaluate a result, notice when something went wrong, and change course instead of failing silently.

  • AI orchestration. Orchestration is the end-to-end layer that coordinates all of the above, deciding which step, tool, or agent runs when. You can think of it as a conductor keeping an orchestra in sync.

None of these components exist in isolation, and  Zapier bundles them together so you don't have to wire them yourself. 

For example, you could build a workflow to handle refund requests: non-agentic work handles the sorting, while agentic features look up the order in your tools, decide if a refund can be issued, and logs it in your CRM. Zapier orchestrates it all while keeping your data secure with enterprise-grade governance features like action restrictions, app access controls, and AI Guardrails.

How do agentic workflows work?

Under the hood, most agentic workflows run some version of the same loop: assess the situation, make a plan, act, look at what happened, and adjust. It runs more like a circle than a straight line:

  1. Understanding the problem. The agent parses the prompt and gathers context—what's being asked, and what information it needs to answer well. This framing step is important because if it misreads the ask here, it will cheerfully do the completely wrong thing for the next four steps.

  2. Planning and executing steps. It breaks the ultimate goal into smaller subtasks and works through them in a sensible order. But the plan isn't locked in stone the way a traditional workflow's steps are; the agent can reorder, drop, or add sub-tasks as it learns what each one turns up.

  3. Tool use. When a step requires outside information or action, the agent calls external software—things like checking a CRM, pulling data, or sending a message. Tools are what turn talk into action: without them, an agent can describe what should happen, but can't touch the tools that move work forward. Zapier gives your agent secure access to 9,000+ apps, so it can access everything it needs without exposing your credentials to the AI model.

  4. Iterations. After each step, it evaluates whether that step succeeded. If it fails, the agent tries a different approach rather than just throwing an error and quitting. This is the part rigid automation can't do: rather than breaking the moment reality strays from the script, an agent notices the miss, adjusts, and takes another run at it, or escalates to a human when it's stuck.

  5. Memory. It holds onto short-term and (sometimes) long-term context, so earlier steps inform later ones, and the workflow improves rather than starting from scratch each time. Short-term memory keeps it coherent within a single run, while long-term memory, which is baked into some agents, lets it recall a customer's history or a preference from last week, so it isn't reintroducing itself on every interaction like a goldfish with a tie on.

A diagram that shows how an agentic workflow operates.

Single agent vs. multi-agent workflows

A single-agent workflow is exactly what it sounds like: one agent, pointed at one job, doing that job well. It's simpler to build, easier to reason about, and cheaper to run, which is why single-agent systems held the majority of the market up to roughly 2025 (which is approximately 20 years ago in AI years). For a well-defined task—like, summarize these documents, enrich this lead, triage this ticket—a single agent is usually all you need, and adding more would just create overhead.

Multi-agent workflows split the work across several specialized agents that collaborate, often in a role-based structure that looks a lot like a virtual company. A researcher agent hands off to a writer agent, which hands off to a manager agent (I have yet to determine if these virtual managers give virtual performance reviews). This approach shines on complex, multi-domain tasks that don't fit neatly into one agent's lane.

Zapier supports both ends of this spectrum: you can run a single agent for a focused task, or chain several together—either by building a workflow with multiple agent steps or by having one agent call others from its instructions—when the job calls for a team.

Top benefits of agentic workflows

Chasing everything agentic because it's flashy is a great way to end up with an expensive demo and nothing to show for it. The reason to build agentic workflows is duller and better: they hand back hours, swallow the work nobody enjoyed anyway, and keep going while you sleep. Point them at the right problems, and the payoff tends to land in four places:

  • Increased efficiency. Agents take on the repetitive research and copy-paste busywork that devours a human's workday—things like ticket triage and data lookups. Hand that off, and your team gets its hours back for the work that actually needs a person.

  • Boosted scalability. An agent that qualifies one lead or completes one task can do a thousand just as happily (and nearly just as fast). So a small team can punch well above its weight without the headcount that usually rides along with growth.

  • Enhanced customer experience. With customer-facing agents, consumers can get answers in minutes instead of days. Agents respond fast, consistently, and in the middle of the night, which means people hear back while they still care about the question they asked.

As beneficial as they are, every agent you wire into a business tool is one more key floating around your systems—one over-permissioned bot can do a startling amount of damage before anyone notices. Tools like Zapier can act as the governed layer between your agents and your data: connections run on managed, encrypted credentials with SOC 2 compliance, and admins decide exactly what each agent is allowed to do. So you can take advantage of agentic workflows without risking complete organizational annihilation. 

Popular tools and frameworks for agentic workflows

If you're building agents from code, a few frameworks come up constantly:

  • LangChain is the flexible, broad-ecosystem option, favored for orchestration and its wide library of integrations.

  • CrewAI takes a role-based approach built for multiple agents collaborating like a team.

  • AutoGen, from Microsoft, leans into conversational, human-in-the-loop patterns where agents message back and forth to work through a task.

They're capable tools, but they all assume you're comfortable writing and maintaining code.

Zapier is the option for everyone else: the citizen developers, the teams who could code but would rather ship, and the motivated team members who want to bring agentic efficiency to their business without learning JavaScript first. 

A graphic showing how Zapier MCP and SDK can connect your workflows.

You can build agentic workflows on Zapier in a few ways, depending on how you like to work:

  • AI by Zapier lets you build agentic tooling and AI directly into your trigger-based workflows, adding steps that reason over your data and act on it. It combines the best of both deterministic automation and AI automation.

  • Zapier MCP securely connects your AI agent harness (like Claude, ChatGPT, and Cursor) to 9,000+ apps, so it can complete tasks directly from the chat window. All while you control exactly which actions it's allowed to take with enterprise-grade governance, OAuth authorizations, and app access controls. 

  • Zapier SDK is there if you live in code files—wiring your tech stack into editors like Cursor or VS Code—and the Zapier CLI handles terminal installs.

Real-world agentic workflow use cases

Agentic workflows aren't a someday technology; teams are already running them across every function. Here's what that looks like in sales, marketing, customer service, and IT, based on experiences from Zapier customers.

Sales

Sales teams lose a surprising number of hours to figuring out what to do next: which deals are stalling, which accounts need attention, or which thread went quiet. At Gourmet Ads, a digital advertising company, that intelligence was scattered across Salesforce, Google Analytics, and a stack of other tools. President of Gourmet Ads, Benjamin Christie, used Zapier to connect it all to Claude: the AI reads across every system, flags stalled work and anomalies, ranks the highest-impact fixes, and writes a short list of recommended actions into the team's shared workspace.

Salesforce stays the system of record, but instead of one more dashboard to squint at, the team gets a prioritized set of next moves delivered on a schedule. The cross-referencing that used to eat a rep's morning happens on its own, so people spend their time on the deals most likely to move.

Marketing

Marketing, especially agency marketing, runs on repetitive reporting and delivery work that scales badly—every new client is another pile of dashboards to check and decks to assemble. One Toronto SEO agency rebuilt its entire client-delivery process on Zapier. At month's end, the system pulls site performance, traffic, and Google Business Profile data into a client-ready report, and it even routes image generation through Zapier, dropping a client's logo onto trucks and boxes for a moving company account, with each client carrying its own visual brief in the same hub.

The target the owner is building toward is roughly 30 minutes of hands-on time per client each month, down from the 10 to 15 hours it takes today, without adding headcount. And because the reports run on live data instead of static spreadsheets, he expects the output to come out sharper than manual delivery, not just faster.

Customer service

Support is where the efficiency math gets dramatic, because every ticket could add minutes to hours of manual research and customer care. At ClickUp, the support team handles around 5,000 tickets a month, and each one used to start with roughly 15 minutes of hunting—pulling context from Zendesk, cross-referencing docs, finding the right runbook—before a rep could even begin a reply. Corey Smith, a Senior Technical Support Engineer, used Zapier to build a triage system that does all of that automatically, handing each rep a structured summary before they type a word.

Per-ticket research time fell from 15 minutes to about four. Across 5,000 tickets, that's more than 900 hours back every month—from one workflow, built by one engineer. Other ClickUp teams saw it working and asked for the same setup, which is usually the clearest sign a workflow is earning its keep.

IT

IT teams spend a startling amount of time on provisioning requests that arrive as messy, one-off messages. At Palo Alto Networks, every demo account creation, license reset, and access approval flowed through a Slack channel that someone had to read and fulfill by hand—and because employees phrased requests differently every time, a rigid script couldn't parse them. Stas Bilder, on the Solutions Architecture team, built AI Zap workflows that interpret each plain-language request, provision accounts across multiple systems, assign licenses, and route access approvals back to the channel.

The workflows now serve more than 3,000 internal users, and tuning the bot's replies cuts follow-up questions by 20%. All told, the system eliminated the equivalent of one full-time role—about $150,000 a year—and the team is now productizing the chat interface for customers.

Build agentic workflows with Zapier

Agentic workflows are what you get when automation stops waiting for instructions and starts working like my prized handyman: reading a situation, making a call, using tools, and adjusting when the first attempt misses. What makes that process realistic for your team, instead of purely aspirational, comes down to the platform you build on.

Zapier is an AI orchestration platform that lets you build agentic workflows across your organization. With AI by Zapier, you can drop agentic AI straight into a workflow; and Zapier MCP lets you take action across 9,000+ apps directly from Claude, ChatGPT, or your AI client of choice. Most importantly, all of it runs on enterprise-grade governance like managed credentials and fine-grained access controls. That means you can build agentic workflows anywhere and connect them safely with Zapier. 

Try Zapier

Related reading:

  • AI agent frameworks: Definition, comparison, and guide

  • What are ReAct agents and how do they work?

  • Human-in-the-loop in AI workflows

  • Agentic AI vs. RPA: Everything you need to know

Get productivity tips delivered straight to your inbox

We’ll email you 1-3 times per week—and never share your information.

tags

Related articles

Improve your productivity automatically. Use Zapier to get your apps working together.

Sign up
See how Zapier works
A Zap with the trigger 'When I get a new lead from Facebook,' and the action 'Notify my team in Slack'